From: Rob McDonald (robmexpert@gmail.com)
Date: Fri May 18 2007 - 03:06:49 ART
Thanks Bhaskar, Derby and Uchil for the reply. I found my mistake in the
distribute-list command.
Derby,
Thanks for the wonderful link. It did help me clear some of my doubts about
using a prefix-list.
So If all the interfaces are defined by /24 in the network and I'm sending
the specifices of 150.32.0.0/16 to the backbone router. Does this mean my
prefix-list would look like this?
ip prefix-list RIP->BB1 seq 5 permit 150.32.0.0/16 ge 24
and in case if I'm sending all the routes in the network:
ip prefix-list RIP->BB1 seq 5 permit 150.32.0.0/16 le 32
Does this sound correct?
Thanks,
--Rob
On 5/16/07, Darby Weaver <darbyweaver@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Your prefix list might need more definition.
>
> Try this on for size:
>
> http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200404/msg00539.html
>
> Enjoy!!!
> --- Rob McDonald <robmexpert@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello Group,
> >
> > I am trying to send only 150.32.0.0/16 to BB1 from
> > R6 through rip while
> > using the distribute-list and prefix-list.
> >
> >
> > R6# sh run | b router rip
> >
> > router rip
> > version 2
> > redistribute ospf 1 metric 5
> > passive-interface default
> > no passive-interface FastEthernet0/0
> > network 180.1.0.0
> > distribute-list RIP->BB1 out FastEthernet0/0
> > no auto-summary
> >
> > !
> > ip prefix-list RIP->BB1 seq 5 permit 150.32.0.0/16
> >
> >
> >
> > Still I see all the routes at BB1. Is there anything
> > that I'm doing wrong in
> > defining my prefix list.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rob
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:21 ART