Re: OSPF NSSA AREA question interpretation

From: Ronnie Angello (ronnie.angello@gmail.com)
Date: Thu May 17 2007 - 12:15:16 ART


That would prevent inter-area routes from entering the area as well.

On 5/17/07, Sean.Zimmerman@clubcorp.com <Sean.Zimmerman@clubcorp.com> wrote:
>
>
> I can't take it any more.
> Aren't we talking about a totally stubby NSSA here? Or am I just way off
> base?
>
>
> *"Ronnie Angello" <ronnie.angello@gmail.com>*
> Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
>
> 05/17/2007 09:28 AM Please respond to
> "Ronnie Angello" <ronnie.angello@gmail.com>
>
> To
> "Darby Weaver" <darbyweaver@yahoo.com> cc
> "Brian Dennis" <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>, iyux2000@gmail.com,
> ccielab@groupstudy.com Subject
> Re: OSPF NSSA AREA question interpretation
>
>
>
>
> Not to speak for Brian here, but apparently the task specifically referred
> to external routes not being flooded (or entering) into the NSSA. The
> first
> thing that comes to my mind is 'area nssa no-redistribution.' I have not
> seen the actual scenario so I may be missing a piece of it and could be
> wrong.
>
> On 5/17/07, Darby Weaver <darbyweaver@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Brian,
> >
> > Are you saying that the ip ospf flood reduction knob
> > does solve this problem or not? I'm thinking it does,
> > but please correct me if I mistake its usage.
> >
> > It sounded like you said it doesn't really meet the
> > requirements, then you in your answer (that does???)
> > meet the requirements the only word difference is "can
> > not flood..." and "should not be sent..."
> >
> > I would think the command fits. Especially since it is
> > probably a translation from another language and may
> > not be exactly 100% explicit.
> >
> > Let me know if I'm misunderstanding something here.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Darby
> >
> >
> > --- Brian Dennis <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The OSPF flood reduction feature doesn't really meet
> > > the requirements. The
> > > question could be worded: "external routes from the
> > > ASBR should not be sent
> > > into this particular area"
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Brian Dennis, CCIE4 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP)
> > > bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
> > >
> > > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com <http://www.internetworkexpert.com/>
> > > Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> > > Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/15/07 5:37 PM, "iyux2000@gmail.com"
> > > <iyux2000@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, group
> > > > Here is the scenario, i configured an OSPF
> > > area with NSSA feature enabled,
> > > > but the requirement says "external routes from
> > > ASBR can not flood in this
> > > > particular area", what does that mean? what's your
> > > response? My answer is to
> > > > configure "ip ospf flood-reduction" in this area?
> > > Is that correct?
> > > > Thank you for your reply.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ronald Angello
> CCIE #17846
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>

-- 
Ronald Angello
CCIE #17846


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:21 ART