From: Ronnie Angello (ronnie.angello@gmail.com)
Date: Tue May 15 2007 - 22:27:56 ART
Just to add to the previous hints, look into the options of the 'area nssa'
command.
On 5/15/07, anthony.sequeira@thomson.com <anthony.sequeira@thomson.com>
wrote:
>
> I would like to see the exact wording of the entire task, but my guess
> is here that you have misinterpreted this task.
>
> OSPF Flood Reduction targets all LSAs and reduces overhead in stable
> networks through the elimination of the "paranoid update" feature.
>
> Here it looks like the task author wanted to throw you off with the
> terminology. External routes from ASBR cannot "flood" into the area
> sounds like it was meant to be synonymous with "enter" the area.
>
> Here is a link to a nice article on Flood Reduction in case you have not
> seen it:
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121newft
> /121t/121t2/dt_ospff.htm
>
>
> Anthony J. Sequeira
> #15626
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> iyux2000@gmail.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 8:37 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: OSPF NSSA AREA question interpretation
>
> Hi, group
> Here is the scenario, i configured an OSPF area with NSSA feature
> enabled, but the requirement says "external routes from ASBR can not
> flood in this particular area", what does that mean? what's your
> response? My answer is to configure "ip ospf flood-reduction" in this
> area? Is that correct?
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Ronald Angello CCIE #17846
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:21 ART