From: Kim (support@isolvesystems.com)
Date: Tue May 15 2007 - 10:43:41 ART
Thanks Dan. I got it. The answer to the workbook is incorrect...
Regards,
Kim
On 5/15/07, Dan C <cdan2154@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Kim, thats correct both ends of the tunnel should be in area 0 similar
> with virtual link. Cheers, Dan
>
> On 5/15/07, Kim < support@isolvesystems.com> wrote:
> >
> > I am aware that vl cannot be used in stub or nssa. May I know when a
> > tunnel is built between segregated Area 0s, this tunnel should be in area 0,
> > right?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Kim
> >
> > On 5/14/07, Dan C <cdan2154@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello there,
> > >
> > > You can not user virtual links in stub or nssa areas.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Dan
> > >
> > > On 5/15/07, Kim < support@isolvesystems.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Here's the OSPF network.
> > > > R4---(area 0)---R5---(area 57 stub)---SW1(VL5 Area 0)
> > > >
> > > > The question disallow the use of GRE tunnel. The solution guide uses
> > > > ipip
> > > > tunnel. The tunnel uses ip unnumbered using interfaces connecting
> > > > R5 and
> > > > SW1. This would make the tunnel interface in the area 57 stub
> > > > network. I
> > > > am confused by how this allow the segregated VL5 area to be
> > > > connected to the
> > > > area 0 between R4 and R5.
> > > >
> > > > Please help.
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > Kim
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > >
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:21 ART