From: Tony Schaffran (groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com)
Date: Fri May 11 2007 - 14:01:39 ART
Do you get the same results if you use an interface dlci on r4 instead of
two separate IP maps?
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
www.cconlinelabs.com
Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
premkumar somasundaram
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 9:37 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Frame-relay
Group,
I came across a peculiar situation when I was doing one lab. The question
was to create a partial mesh between R2, R3, R4. Where as R2 has a point to
point link to R3. R3 has the serial interface connected to R2 and R4. R4 has
to pass to R3 to reach R2. I configured it and it worked as expected. After
1hr , I rechecked and I found that from R2 to R4 or vice versa, I get two
request timed outs out of Five. I bounced the interface and it started to
work fine. The config is given below. Is there any thing am missing
here.....
R2
interface Serial1/0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
!
interface Serial1/0.1 point-to-point
ip address 162.1.0.2 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 203
R3
interface Serial2/0
ip address 162.1.0.3 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay map ip 162.1.0.2 302 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 162.1.0.4 304 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
frame-relay lmi-type cisco
R4
interface Serial2/0
ip address 162.1.0.4 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay map ip 162.1.0.2 403 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 162.1.0.3 403 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
frame-relay lmi-type cisco
Thanks
Prem
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:20 ART