From: anthony.sequeira@thomson.com
Date: Wed May 09 2007 - 14:18:18 ART
Yeah - if you are starting with a "clean slate", in other words, you
have not already started mastering a set of docs, you should most likely
make 12.4 your base.
Since these docs should include 12.2 and 12.3 features - I would doubt
you need to go to the previous docs much if at all during the exam.
I did not want to jump ahead to 12.4 as my base because it can take me
4-5 minutes to find a feature there compared to 30 seconds when I am in
12.2.
Anthony J. Sequeira
#15626
________________________________
From: Andy [mailto:and123and@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 12:54 PM
To: Sequeira, Anthony (NETg)
Cc: gary.duncanson@googlemail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Stick with 12.4 IOS on doc CD
So, using your methodology, and given the fact that I have no preference
at this moment, I would start with 12.4 (as this is current for me at
this point in time), and if I can not find what I want then go to
12.3,12.2 .
I remember someone saying that certain IOS trains had some better
documentation over another, but Ill try the 12.4 and if not "happy" with
the info look in 12.3 or 12.2. Would be interested to see how other folk
do this tho...
On 09/05/07, anthony.sequeira@thomson.com <anthony.sequeira@thomson.com
> wrote:
Hi Andy!
Here is what worked for me.
When I first started studying, the blueprint indicated that I should
know 12.2 features. So naturally, I started practicing, studying, and
working with the 12.2 area of docs.
As my studying stretched into years, Cisco announced 12.3 and then 12.4
features were a possibility.
Because I had become so fast and so knowledgeable of the 12.2 docs - I
DID NOT switch. On my final lab attempt, I used the 12.2 docs and
benefited from my blazing speed and familiarity with them. If I
suspected that a task required a new feature from 12.3 or 12.4 - I would
then enter those documents to find it. Since I had practiced using those
documents as well - it was not like I was totally lost within them. I
just preferred to stick with 12.2 as my base!
Anthony J Sequeira
#15626
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Andy
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 12:11 PM
To: Gary Duncanson
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Stick with 12.4 IOS on doc CD
Thanks, I have viewed the COD, and it was usefull in how to search etc.
I
was just wondering if I shoud concentrate on the 12.4 IOS as primary,
and if
I can not find it there then search in 12.3 or 12.2.
Or, are some subjects better represented in one IOS train over another,
I
would hope not as this would mean a lot of memorizing ...
On 09/05/07, Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> I imagine so Andy.
>
> Regards
> Gary
>
>
>
> On 5/9/07, Andy <and123and@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > how do you guys approach the doc cd, to look for 3550/60 stuff go to
the
> > 3550/60 sections, no probs there.
> > What about the IOS, should I concentrate my efforts on the 12.4
train,
> > 12.3seems "messy", and surely
> > 12.4 will contain everything that is in 12.2 - right ? So just stick
> > with
> > 3550/60 and 12.4 train IOS?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:20 ART