From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Wed May 09 2007 - 11:22:53 ART
Well, the choice for balancing would an outbound concept only, and it's
locally significant (meaning the receiving end really has no choice in the
matter)....
So you could use it on one side only if that's where you wanted to do
things. Or you could even pick different methods on each side of the link.
If the lab doesn't specify anything, personally, I'd leave it alone. You
don't get points for pretty networks. You get points for doing only what
they ask!
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Hossam Abbas
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 6:46 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Port-channel Load-balance
Hi Guys,
i have some questions about "Port-channel Load-balance"
1) when using it on ethercahnnel port should i put it on both sides, or i
could use it on one side??
2) if in the LAB didn't define what type of load-balance he needs (src-mac,
dest-mac, src-ip,...) is there any clue how could i decide which type i
use??
3) if u i choose load-blance type for ex. src-mac, could i use on the other
side of the channel for ex dest-mac?? or they must be the same??
if u want to know what i believe in is: i could use it from one side only,
and i could use to different types of load balance from both side
am i right!!!!!!!!!!1
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:20 ART