Why not CBWFQ in switches ?

From: John Gibson (johngibson1541@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue May 08 2007 - 17:31:08 ART

• Next message: Alexei Monastyrnyi: "Re: #17874"
• Previous message: Jason Plank: "Re: #17874"
• Next in thread: John Gibson: "Re: Why not CBWFQ in switches ?"
• Maybe reply: John Gibson: "Re: Why not CBWFQ in switches ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Too expensive ? Too slow ? Both right ? Neither ?
These are expensive switches , doesn't sound right to
save some little money on the circuits and chips.

John

• Next message: Alexei Monastyrnyi: "Re: #17874"
• Previous message: Jason Plank: "Re: #17874"
• Next in thread: John Gibson: "Re: Why not CBWFQ in switches ?"
• Maybe reply: John Gibson: "Re: Why not CBWFQ in switches ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:20 ART