From: Sean.Zimmerman@clubcorp.com
Date: Mon May 07 2007 - 17:55:54 ART
Right, but as Erol stated, he's redistributing connected in this case.
He's restricted from enabling a routing protocol on the interface.
"Edison Ortiz" <edisonmortiz@gmail.com>
05/07/2007 03:53 PM
To
<Sean.Zimmerman@clubcorp.com>
cc
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject
Re: redistribute connected with a route map
As mentioned before, OSPF is not enabled on that interface.
----- Original Message -----
From: Sean.Zimmerman@clubcorp.com
To: Edison Ortiz
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com ; Erol Asim ; nobody@groupstudy.com
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: redistribute connected with a route map
I've always had to do this, and this seems to be default IOS behavior, but
why? I can specifically recall from IE's COD when Brian Dennis states that
you must know why you're doing something. My assumption is that Cisco
doesn't allow transitive redistibution on the same router, and this
restrictcion applies to connected route redistribution. But, that's just
an assumption.
"Edison Ortiz" <edisonmortiz@gmail.com>
Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
05/07/2007 03:39 PM
Please respond to
"Edison Ortiz" <edisonmortiz@gmail.com>
To
"Erol Asim" <erol.asim@gmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
cc
Subject
Re: redistribute connected with a route map
Redistribute connected under the RIP process using the same route-map.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Erol Asim" <erol.asim@gmail.com>
To: "Brian McGahan" <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; "Mihai iancu" <mpiancu@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: redistribute connected with a route map
> Sorry, I should have made myself more clear - loopback 1 is required
> to be advertised by redistributing ospf into rip. Loopback 1 cannot be
> added to OSPF. Is this possible? Thank you for the response.
>
> On 5/7/07, Brian McGahan <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
>> You didn't enable OSPF on the Loopback1 interface. Look at the
>> "show ip ospf interface brief" output and you'll see what interfaces
are
>> candidate to be redistributed. If you want that advertised into RIP
>> either add the network 192.168.2.0 command under RIP, the redistribute
>> connected command under RIP, or enable OSPF on the interface.
>>
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>> Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 (R&S/SP)
>> bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>>
>> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>> Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
>> Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
>> 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
>> Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> Erol Asim
>> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 2:38 PM
>> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Subject: redistribute connected with a route map
>>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I'm perplexed by problem I don't understand. For some reason when I
>> redistribute ospf into rip, loopback 1 on r3 is not seen on r1. From
>> my understanding, redistribute ospf will take all routes in the ospf
>> database and advertise them to r1. Is this correct? If so, why isn't
>> this occurring? Does this have something to do with route map and
>> redistribtion on r3? Debug on r1 confirms r3 is not advertising the
>> route. Can anyone help? Topology is below:
>>
>> ================r5
>> hostname r5
>> !
>> interface Ethernet0
>> ip address 10.0.0.1 255.0.0.0
>> no shut
>> !
>> router rip
>> network 10.0.0.1
>> ================r3
>> hostname r3
>> !
>> interface Loopback0
>> ip address 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0
>> !
>> interface Loopback1
>> ip address 192.168.2.3 255.255.255.0
>> !
>> interface Loopback2
>> ip address 192.168.3.3 255.255.255.0
>> !
>> interface Ethernet0/0
>> ip address 10.0.0.3 255.0.0.0
>> ip ospf net point-to-point
>> !
>> router ospf 1
>> redistribute connected subnets route-map LOOP_1
>> network 10.0.0.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
>> network 192.168.3.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
>> no auto
>> !
>> router rip
>> redistribute ospf 1 metric 3
>> net 10.0.0.3
>> network 192.168.1.3
>> no auto-summary
>> !
>> route-map LOOP_1 permit 10
>> match interface loopback 1
>> ================r1
>> hostname r1
>> !
>> interface Ethernet0
>> ip address 10.0.0.1 255.0.0.0
>> no shut
>> !
>> router rip
>> network 10.0.0.1
>> ======================================
>> C 10.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Ethernet0
>> R 192.168.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.0.0.3, 00:00:00, Ethernet0
>> R 192.168.3.0/24 [120/3] via 10.0.0.3, 00:00:00, Ethernet0
>> r1#
>> ======================================
>> C 10.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
>> C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0
>> C 192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback1
>> C 192.168.3.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback2
>> r3#
>> ======================================
>> C 10.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Ethernet0
>> O E2 192.168.2.0/24 [110/20] via 10.0.0.3, 01:59:34, Ethernet0
>> 192.168.3.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>> O 192.168.3.3 [110/11] via 10.0.0.3, 01:59:34, Ethernet0
>> r5#
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:20 ART