Re: BGP peerings Loopback or Physical interfaces

From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sun May 06 2007 - 01:41:48 ART

• Next message: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: IPSEC over TCP on IOS"
• Previous message: Brian Dennis: "Re: CCIE Voice"
• Maybe in reply to: mohammed shoeb ahmed: "BGP peerings Loopback or Physical interfaces"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

If the lab does not specify directly or indirectly then do whatever you
want. It's that simple ;-)

-- 
Brian Dennis, CCIE4 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
 
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
On 5/5/07 4:35 PM, "mohammed shoeb ahmed" <mdshoeb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> Question is very simple but it may help me from not loosing points in real
> lab, should I use loopback interfaces for establishing peerings with in my
> pod or should I use physical interfaces. If LAB is not specific to it.
> 
> your help will be appreciated

• Next message: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: IPSEC over TCP on IOS"
• Previous message: Brian Dennis: "Re: CCIE Voice"
• Maybe in reply to: mohammed shoeb ahmed: "BGP peerings Loopback or Physical interfaces"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:20 ART