Re: BGP Confederation

From: WorkerBee (ciscobee@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Apr 26 2007 - 13:33:14 ART


For R1 to peer to R2 where both are different sub-AS, the answer is yes.
It is a must to specify the confederation peer commands.

If R1 and R2 belongs to the same sub-AS, you do not need the
confederation peer command.

On 4/27/07, premkumar somasundaram <premkumar.somasundaram@gmail.com> wrote:
> Group,
> Could any one tell me whether bgp confederation peer is mandatory for
> configuring bgp confederation. For example, if R1 belongs to As 65011, R2
> belongs to As 65012 and both of them belong to AS 100. If we need to have
> peering between R1 & R2, I agree that BGP confederation Identifier is a
> must. But is the bgp confederation peer required in this case ??
>
>
> Thanks
> Prem
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 01 2007 - 08:28:38 ART