From: Iamgoingtobeaccie
Date: Tue Apr 24 2007 - 23:56:49 ART
ye Maureen,
Thanks.Actually Victor referred me to this site and I was able to figure it out.Thanks for ur time.
maureen schaar <maureen.schaar@gmail.com> wrote: The mask set on the interface has to EXACTLY match the route.
There is a very good example of this on the cisco website, which
describes the LSP problem with ospf advertising loopbacks as /32:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk436/tk428/technologies_tech_note09186a0080144ab2.shtml
HTH
Maureen
On 4/23/07, Iamgoingtobeaccie Iamgoingtobeaccie
wrote:
> Group,
> Do we have a separate list for CCIE-SP??I did subscribe to CS,but there is no response to it.
>
> I have a basic MPLS topology with OSPF as the IGP.If I adverise the loopbacks with their default network type,their /32 network is not being assigned labels.(Untagged) When I change the network type to point-to-point,i see pop-tag is attached in the "show mpls forwarding" command which is expected.
>
> Is there a problem with Implicit null tag for /32 networks here.
>
> R1#sh mpls for
> Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes tag Outgoing Next Hop
> tag tag or VC or Tunnel Id switched interface
> 43 Untagged 5.5.5.5/32 0 Et0/0 190.1.18.5
>
>
> R1#sh mpls for
> Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes tag Outgoing Next Hop
> tag tag or VC or Tunnel Id switched interface
> 41 Pop tag 5.5.5.5//24 0 Et0/0 190.1.18.5
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Check out what you're missing if you're not on Yahoo! Messenger
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
---------------------------------
SHOUT IT OUT! Tell everyone, from anywhere, that you're online on Yahoo! Messenger
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 01 2007 - 08:28:37 ART