From: Jim (firstnamejim@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Apr 24 2007 - 20:09:44 ART
Hi all,
I don't know if this is related to difference between 3640 and 2600, but
here is the problem:
R2 (fa0/0) ---- BB2
# R2
bridge irb
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
ipv6 address 2001:192:10:1::2/64
ipv6 rip RIPng enable
ipv6 rip 1 enable
bridge-group 1
!
interface Serial0/0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
no fair-queue
frame-relay map bridge 201 broadcast
bridge-group 1
!
interface BVI1
ip address 192.10.1.2 255.255.255.0
ip verify unicast source reachable-via any allow-self-ping
bridge 1 proto ieee
bridge 1 route ip
The above matches closely the suggested answer, but I see the follow issue:
I have no ip6 rip routes from BB2, while BB2 sees the ipv6 rip routes from
R2.
When I put a sniffer on that port for R2, I see the RIPng packet from BB2,
but R2 just seemed not able to pass it on to the ipv6 stack.
The RIP packets were sent to the 33:33:00:00:00:09 address (FF02::9).
I tried delete the bridge command under f0/0, R2 immediately start to
install the RIPng routes.
Any idea why?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 01 2007 - 08:28:37 ART