From: John Jones (acer0001@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Apr 23 2007 - 00:29:16 ART
Also keep in mind that this may be IOS version dependent. I did lab this up
recently and it works for some versions of the latest IOS and not others.
John
On 4/22/07, Godswill Oletu <oletu@inbox.lv> wrote:
>
> Bit,
>
> VTP version 1 in transparent mode will make sure that the domain name &
> version number matches before they can forward an advertisement. VTP
> version
> 2 in transparent mode will forward the advertisement without checking the
> version number, but the domain name must match.
>
> The VTP mode not withstanding, Cisco Switches will ignore advertisements
> with different domain name and earlier configuration revision number.
>
> HTH.
>
> Godswill Oletu
> CCIE #16464
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bit Gossip" <bit.gossip@chello.nl>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 3:39 PM
> Subject: VTP transparent mode
>
>
> > Group,
> > my understanding is that a VTP transparent switch will always forward
> VTP
> bpdu
> > accross its trunk ports, even if it belongs to a different domain. In
> other
> > words:
> >
> > S1 ====== S2 ====== S3
> >
> > S1 and S3 belongs to the same VTP domain VTP1
> > S2 belongs to a different domain VTP2
> >
> > I thought that S2 should pass VTP bpdu between S1 and S3 so that S1 and
> S3
> can
> > stay in synch.
> >
> > BUT when I labbed, it didn't work like that and S1 and S3 don't synch.
> >
> > What is the real truth here?
> > Thanks,
> > Bit.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 01 2007 - 08:28:37 ART