Redistribute connected

From: ruth wainwright (ruthwainwright@yahoo.com.au)
Date: Thu Apr 19 2007 - 12:00:13 ART

• Next message: John Gibson: "iPhone effect ?"
• Previous message: John Gibson: "VMPS being deprecated in favor of 802.1x ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi

If you have a 'redistribute connected' statement with route-map and matching access list statement, is it true to say that any connected prefix not included in this initial access list (since it is checked first?) will not be redistributed even if it is stipulated in a later redistribution route-map and access list?

Thanks

Ruth

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com

• Next message: John Gibson: "iPhone effect ?"
• Previous message: John Gibson: "VMPS being deprecated in favor of 802.1x ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 01 2007 - 08:28:36 ART