From: John Gibson (johngibson1541@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Apr 19 2007 - 11:22:08 ART
We are not in a james pond movie. I think
administrators know if their APs are not physically
secured. univercd should not have to single out this
as a "topology".
--- John Gibson <johngibson1541@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I understand multiple-host mode, but univercd's
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3560/12235se/scg1/sw8021x.htm#wp1192140
>
> says the client laptops used 802.1x with the AP,
> then
> the AP again uses 802.1x with 3560. Does that sound
> unnecessary to you?
>
> Only scenario I can think of is that the AP is out
> on a desk or on a public area dry wall being touched
> by any one or any one with a ladder and can be
> swapped
> at any time with a rogue AP. Is that what they are
> talking about ? The hacker is very low. I am not
> sure.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 01 2007 - 08:28:36 ART