From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Apr 14 2007 - 01:45:28 ART
Replied privately.
--- Ryan <ryan95842@gmail.com> wrote:
> Your comment about quota's got me thinking...a
> little on the conspiracy
> side, maybe...
>
> Let's assume their is a quota system for a moment,
> and they need to fail
> some people. So how do you fail some one with a
> working configuration?
>
> Let's take NTP as an example (since I was reading
> the Doc CD on it today)
> and the always questioned, "over configuration".
>
> The question of over configuration has been brought
> up numerous times and
> the general consensus is that it won't hurt you.
> UNLESS their is a quota
> system!!!!
>
> So for an example, let's say you were asked to
> configure NTP peers. Simple
> enough. But let's say you "over config" and
> configure the 'ntp peer x.x.x.x'
> command for each peer. Sure it will work, but it is
> also not fully correct
> since you only need to configure the peering on one
> router. So a Proctor
> grading could then say, "hmmm...this 'extra'
> configuration demonstrates they
> do not clearly understand this technology. Minus 2
> points".
>
> Oh look! You just failed for over configuration even
> though you had a
> working config...
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> -Ryan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 4/13/07, Darby Weaver <darbyweaver@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Basically a sleepless weekend. With a lot of
> review
> > and soul-searching - not to mention UNIVERCD
> > searching.
> >
> > But the goal is not only to assess but to ensure
> > optimal performancce under adverse conditions as
> well.
> >
> >
> > --- Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Or there will be holes/singes in the exam when
> he's
> > > done. :)
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > jslauer@hotmail.com
> > > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 9:02 PM
> > > To: Darby Weaver; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: Re: Getting medieval this weekend -
> almost
> > > time to confirm 3rd
> > > attempt.
> > >
> > > if your getting medieval does that mean you're
> going
> > > to flog yourself? :)
> > >
> > >
> > > J
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Darby Weaver" <darbyweaver@yahoo.com>
> > > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 8:29 PM
> > > Subject: Getting medieval this weekend - almost
> time
> > > to confirm 3rd attempt.
> > >
> > > > So...
> > > >
> > > > Training dollars are down and tide is high...
> > > >
> > > > 3 IE Mock Labs in the about 40 hours span of
> > > time...
> > > > (I'll be tired and worn out - been this way on
> > > each of my previous lab
> > > > attempts - got to simulate exhaustion too).
> > > >
> > > > 2 more already scheduled for next weekend.
> > > >
> > > > And one more to go.
> > > >
> > > > 2 CCIE Accessors are in the approval process.
> > > >
> > > > And I have a few other labs I am reviewing as
> > > well.
> > > >
> > > > Basically, I should have a decent idea of
> where
> > > most weaknesses are
> > > > and if I have or have not covered them
> properly.
> > > >
> > > > So here I go again...
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 01 2007 - 08:28:35 ART