From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Apr 13 2007 - 21:55:35 ART
I'm hoping. I can still think of some topics - I
might have to dig for, but overall, I can enumerate
all or nearly all lab-related topics off the top of my
head.
I know which ones I still have difficulty in pretty
much but most I can still work my way through most of
the time, however, interpretation can still be a
killer I suppose.
I carefully evaluated my actual past lab performances
and realized not all points were lost due to lack of
knowledge or even of interpretation but instead due to
apathy. For instance, trying to do AND/XORs while
tired and not taking the time to be absolutely
careful. Not verify properly or sometimes realizing
when one item might affect another finished earlier,
etc.
I think the past 6 months have given me time to
reflect a bit on what I do well and what I do not do
quite so well.
--- Scott Morris <smorris@ipexpert.com> wrote:
> Best of luck to you!! The technical details
> certainly seem to have been
> covered!
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service
> Provider) #4713, JNCIE
> #153, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
> IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> smorris@ipexpert.com
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Darby Weaver
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 8:29 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Getting medieval this weekend - almost time
> to confirm 3rd attempt.
>
> So...
>
> Training dollars are down and tide is high...
>
> 3 IE Mock Labs in the about 40 hours span of time...
> (I'll be tired and worn out - been this way on each
> of my previous lab
> attempts - got to simulate exhaustion too).
>
> 2 more already scheduled for next weekend.
>
> And one more to go.
>
> 2 CCIE Accessors are in the approval process.
>
> And I have a few other labs I am reviewing as well.
>
> Basically, I should have a decent idea of where most
> weaknesses are and if I
> have or have not covered them properly.
>
> So here I go again...
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 01 2007 - 08:28:35 ART