Re: trouble understanding L2 protocol tunneling

From: Ronnie Angello (ronnie.angello@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Apr 12 2007 - 14:24:52 ART


...Yes but the ports configured for the l2 protocol tunnel are in access
mode. The trunk link in between the switches is independent of that and can
be configured any which way.

On 4/12/07, Todd, Douglas M. <DTODD@partners.org> wrote:
>
> Hi;
>
> I can get this to work fine, the only thing which may cause you problems
> is DTP:
> CCO:
> The switch does not support Layer 2 protocol tunneling on ports with
> switchport
> mode dynamic auto or dynamic desirable.
> *DTP is not compatible with layer 2 protocol tunneling.
>
> In my config I must use switchport nonegotiate this will disable DTP on
> the
> port. DPT is enabled on the trunk port still (sh int swi | b 0/13) -
>
>
> DMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Ronnie
> Angello
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 8:51 AM
> To: udo
> Cc: dampened; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: trouble understanding L2 protocol tunneling
>
> R1 is connected to vlan 20 via CAT2 fa0/1. R2 is connected to vlan 20 via
> CAT1 fa0/2. There is a dot1q trunk between CAT1 fa0/13 and CAT2 fa0/13.
>
>
> CAT1#s run int fa0/2
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 138 bytes
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/2
> description R2
> switchport access vlan 20
> switchport mode access
> l2protocol-tunnel cdp
> no cdp enable
> end
>
> CAT1#
>
> CAT1#s run int fa0/13
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 113 bytes
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/13
> description cat2
> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
> switchport mode trunk
> end
>
> CAT1#s int trunk
>
> Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
> Fa0/13 on 802.1q trunking 1
>
>
>
>
> CAT2#s run int fa0/1
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 138 bytes
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/1
> description R1
> switchport access vlan 20
> switchport mode access
> l2protocol-tunnel cdp
> no cdp enable
> end
>
> CAT2#
>
> CAT2#s run int fa0/13
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 113 bytes
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/13
> description cat1
> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
> switchport mode trunk
> end
>
> CAT2#s int trunk
>
> Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
> Fa0/13 on 802.1q trunking 1
>
> R1#s cdp ne
> Capability Codes: R - Router, T - Trans Bridge, B - Source Route Bridge
> S - Switch, H - Host, I - IGMP, r - Repeater
>
> Device ID Local Intrfce Holdtme Capability Platform Port
> ID
> R2 Fas 0/0 162 R S I 2610XM Fas
> 0/0
> R1#
>
> R2#s cdp ne
> Capability Codes: R - Router, T - Trans Bridge, B - Source Route Bridge
> S - Switch, H - Host, I - IGMP, r - Repeater
>
> Device ID Local Intrfce Holdtme Capability Platform Port
> ID
> R1 Fas 0/0 148 R S I 2610XM Fas
> 0/0
> R2#
>
>
> On 4/12/07, udo <ccie_ka@arcor.de> wrote:
> >
> > hi,
> >
> > plz can you share the working config ?
> > I also tried this but it doesn't work...
> >
> > thx
> >
> > Am Dienstag, den 03.04.2007, 09:46 +0800 schrieb dampened:
> > > Thank you for the clarification. Ronnie.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Ronnie Angello
> > > To: dampened taker
> > > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 9:48 PM
> > > Subject: Re: trouble understanding L2 protocol tunneling
> > >
> > >
> > > It should not be a problem to have trunk links between the
> > switches. Only
> > > the ports connected to R3 and R5 need to be access or .1q tunnel
> > > ports
> > to
> > > support l2 protocol tunneling.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/2/07, dampened taker <cheechew@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > But the problem with dot1q is between SWA and SWB.
> > > Will dot1q between switches will cause problem?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: "Ronnie Angello" <ronnie.angello@gmail.com>
> > > To: dampened <cheechew@hotmail.com>
> > > CC: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Subject: Re: trouble understanding L2 protocol tunneling
> > > Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 08:05:04 -0400
> > >
> > > The switch supports tunneling of CDP, STP, including multiple
> > > STP
> > (MSTP),
> > > and VTP. Protocol tunneling is disabled by default but can be
> > enabled for
> > > the individual protocols on IEEE 802.1Q tunnel ports or on
> > > access
> > ports.
> > >
> > > Tunneling is not supported on trunk ports. If you enter the
> > > *l2protocol-tunnel
> > > *interface configuration command on a trunk port, the command is
> > > accepted,
> > > but Layer 2 tunneling does not take affect unless you change the
> > port to
> > > a
> > > tunnel port or an access port.
> > > Ronnie
> > >
> > > On 4/2/07, dampened <cheechew@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >Dear Josef,
> > > >
> > > >Which part of the document states it cannot work with dot1q?
> > > >
> > > >It would be strange if the interconnect switch is unable to
> > > support dot1q.
> > > >
> > > >Regards
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Josef A" <josefnet@gmail.com>
> > > > Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > > 03/28/2007 06:43 PM Please respond to
> > > > "Josef A" josefnet@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Layer 2 protocol tunnelling only works with access ports or
> > > tunnel
> > ports.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3560/12225see/s
> > cg
> > > /swtu
> > > >nnel.htm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On 3/27/07, Swan, Jay <jswan@sugf.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I have the following physical topology:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > R3---SwA---SwB---R5
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > R3 and R5 are in access vlan 35 with "l2protocol-tunnel cdp"
> > > on
> > the
> > > > > access ports.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > If I configure the link between SwA and SwB in access vlan
> > > 35
> > with
> > > > > "l2protocol-tunnel cdp", everything works fine: R3 and R5
> > > see
> > each
> > > other
> > > > > as directly connected CDP neighbors. If I configure the link
> > between
> > > SwA
> > > > > and SwB as a hard-coded 802.1q trunk, however, the link is
> > > err-disabled
> > > > > with an l2ptguard error.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't understand why this doesn't work with a trunk link.
> > Thoughts?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Jay
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Find singles online in your area with MSN Dating and Match.com !
> > > http://match.my.msn.com/match/mt.cfm?pg=channel&tcid=281206
> > >
> > > ____________________________________________________________________
> > > ___ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
> The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended
> only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain
> confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
> dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this
> information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
> prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the
> Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this
> information.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 01 2007 - 08:28:35 ART