From: Scott Morris (smorris@ipexpert.com)
Date: Mon Apr 02 2007 - 23:00:32 ART
It is attempting to explain and demonstrate the effect of various ACLs
within the topology.
Of course, you will still see all routes at that point, because no filters
have been placed on any of the routing protocols. Simply packet filters to
affect certain reachability.
So when we start to work with lots of ACLs and see different effects, we'll
get a good sense about what the router is thinking of each time, and can see
the direct changes that we make and how this influences actual behavior on a
router.
Sounds like the desired results were achieved by you!
Enjoy the studies!
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
_____
From: Robert Cuello [mailto:smdmokay@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 8:07 PM
To: Scott Morris; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IPexpert R&S v9 9.1 workbook
Hello Scott,
I'm having a problem understanding the section 9.1 of the R&S workbook.
After applying the Access-list, I cannot ping R1 from R2 and I can ping R1
from R2 as the lab describes. However, I can still see all of the 200.0.0.x
routes in my routing table.
What is it what you are trying to accomplish??
_____
Sucker-punch
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49981/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailb
eta/features_spam.html> spam with award-winning protection.
Try the free
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49981/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailb
eta/features_spam.html> Yahoo! Mail Beta.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 01 2007 - 08:28:34 ART