From: ccie anees (ccieanees@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Mar 30 2007 - 15:21:36 ART
Thanks Joe,
And I see in the Doc CD, no ip pim dm-fallback is configured when the interface is in sparse-mode.
Does PIM DM fallback occurs in Sparse mode also? I was thinking it occurs only on sparse-dense-mode.
Thanks.
Joe Gagznos <kemphall@yahoo.com> wrote:
This will depend on how you have things configured.
What groups are the rp-candidates advertising for?
Remember that your mapping agent is responsible for
receiving the rp announcements from the rp-candidates
and then arbitrating conflicts. The mapping agent is
responsible for announcing the winner of the RP
'election'.
Now, if you have multiple mapping agents it is
possible for each mapping agent to select a different
rp for the same group. The mapping agents work
independently of one another.
HTH,
Joseph Gagznos
CCIE #17009
-- ccie anees wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Source
> |
> |
> |
> ----------------------------
> | |
> R1 (auto RP) R2
> (auto-RP)
> | |
> | |
> | |
>
> ------------------ --------
> |
> |
> |
> R3 (RP Mapping Agent)
> |
> |
> |
> Receivers
>
> In the above scenario, Which RP, the source will
> register. If the source registers with both the RP,
> Do we get the load balancing between RPs?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anees.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Bored stiff? Loosen up...
> Download and play hundreds of games for free on
> Yahoo! Games.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:35:53 ART