Re: Frustrating - failed 1st attempt

From: John Hooper (homith@homith.com)
Date: Thu Mar 29 2007 - 08:48:49 ART


Gee, that means I have had 4 cases of denial so far. I hope I don't have
another, this is getting costly :)

All I can say is stick with it and don't give up, as for me, next time I
will be so prepared its not funny.Actually in a way I am a bit nervous going
back for some reason, you might say its the thought of not passing again
that scares me I think, Anyhow I am counting on 5th time lucky. But I did
enjoy those lunches, Its embarrassing when the people behind the lunch
counter remember you :)

Cheers
John (CCIE - not too far away, I can feel it in my bones)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Duncan Maccubbin" <duncan.maccubbin@earthlink.net>
To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: Frustrating - failed 1st attempt

> "I'm extremely frustrated right now because I walked out believing I had
> nailed it, yet I some how failed and I have no idea what went wrong."
>
> If I had a nickel for every time I have seen this :). The devil is in the
> details.
>
> "Could I have gotten someone else's score report?"
>
> Best case of denial ever! :).
>
> -----Original Message-----
>>From: Ryan <ryan95842@gmail.com>
>>Sent: Mar 28, 2007 7:06 PM
>>To: Cisco certification <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>>Subject: Frustrating - failed 1st attempt
>>
>>I failed my 1st attempt yesterday at San Jose.
>>
>>I'm extremely frustrated right now because I walked out believing I had
>>nailed it, yet I some how failed and I have no idea what went wrong.
>>
>>I arrived 2 days head of time and got a great night's sleep before the
>>lab.
>>I finished the lab in about 5 hours and verified my configurations over
>>the
>>remaining three hours. Found a few minor issues and did some tweaking. I
>>asked the proctors for clarification on almost every question (Proctors
>>were
>>great and very patient) and got good feedback regarding the questions.
>>Reloaded the routers and checked everything again. I left with everything
>>working (except for 3pts of IP service which I intentionally did not do)
>>and
>>feeling like I had just kicked the lab's ass.
>>
>>Then this morning I wake up to a score report that says I failed. What's
>>worse is I have no idea what I could have done wrong. There was nothing on
>>the test that was difficult or I was not very familiar with. I even
>>verified
>>several config's right from the doc CD where the command description read
>>almost verbatim what they were asking.
>>
>>Could I have gotten someone else's score report?
>>
>>I'm sure many have thought the same thing. I'm just really frustrated as I
>>don't know what I did wrong and I have no idea how to prepare for my next
>>attempt?
>>
>>Time management was not an issue, stress was not an issue, technology was
>>not an issue, and I'm pretty sure question interpretation was not an
>>issue.
>>Obviously there was some issue, but how do I find it? How do I found out
>>what I did wrong so I can correct it? Maybe technology was an issue. Maybe
>>I
>>needed more configuration or they were looking for a specific solution.
>>How
>>could I know?
>>
>>Aaaaaghghgh!!!!
>>
>>Sorry for the whining...I'm just really frustrated...
>>
>>
>>-Ryan
>>
>>(going to try to reconstruct the lab from memory and see if I can
>>determine
>>where I went wrong)
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>Subscription information may be found at:
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:35:53 ART