From: Bill Coward (bill.coward@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Mar 28 2007 - 20:29:20 ART
If you got 100% on most of the sections and like 80 to 90% on one or more
sections I would pay for a regrade. But if you got less that 70% on any
section I think that would be enough to give you an overall score of less
than 80?
Your score report should give you a clue on where you went wrong.
-B
On 3/28/07, Ryan <ryan95842@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I failed my 1st attempt yesterday at San Jose.
>
> I'm extremely frustrated right now because I walked out believing I had
> nailed it, yet I some how failed and I have no idea what went wrong.
>
> I arrived 2 days head of time and got a great night's sleep before the
> lab.
> I finished the lab in about 5 hours and verified my configurations over
> the
> remaining three hours. Found a few minor issues and did some tweaking. I
> asked the proctors for clarification on almost every question (Proctors
> were
> great and very patient) and got good feedback regarding the questions.
> Reloaded the routers and checked everything again. I left with everything
> working (except for 3pts of IP service which I intentionally did not do)
> and
> feeling like I had just kicked the lab's ass.
>
> Then this morning I wake up to a score report that says I failed. What's
> worse is I have no idea what I could have done wrong. There was nothing on
> the test that was difficult or I was not very familiar with. I even
> verified
> several config's right from the doc CD where the command description read
> almost verbatim what they were asking.
>
> Could I have gotten someone else's score report?
>
> I'm sure many have thought the same thing. I'm just really frustrated as I
> don't know what I did wrong and I have no idea how to prepare for my next
> attempt?
>
> Time management was not an issue, stress was not an issue, technology was
> not an issue, and I'm pretty sure question interpretation was not an
> issue.
> Obviously there was some issue, but how do I find it? How do I found out
> what I did wrong so I can correct it? Maybe technology was an issue. Maybe
> I
> needed more configuration or they were looking for a specific solution.
> How
> could I know?
>
> Aaaaaghghgh!!!!
>
> Sorry for the whining...I'm just really frustrated...
>
>
> -Ryan
>
> (going to try to reconstruct the lab from memory and see if I can
> determine
> where I went wrong)
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:35:53 ART