From: A.G. Ananth Sarma (GMail) (ananth.sarma@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 19 2007 - 14:34:24 ART
Hi Matt,
By principle, etherchannel is created between 2 switches where the 2 or more
member ports shall be with identical configuration of speed, duplex and so
on. They will serve together to increase throughput as well as redundant
connection should any other member port fails.
Though your thinking is very valid and novel, I feel this configuration will
not work.
Can the experts give their valuable input?
Regards,
Ananth
On 3/19/07, Matt Netw <mattnetw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi GS,
>
> it s possible make a L2 etherchannel between 1 catalyst in a end and 2
> differents catalyst at other end?
>
> SW1 have 2 fastether in l2 etherchannel, SW2 and SW3 only 1 fastehter
> each,
> all switches with int vlan 100 and ip add 1.1.1.x, the port-channel
> interface is UP, but there arent PING.
>
>
> * SW2
> *
> *
> SW1 *
> *
> *
> * SW3
>
> Any thought, thanks to all,
>
> Matt.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Regards,A.G . Ananthasubramania Sarma
Tel: (00971) 2 6315826 (R) Mob: (00971)50-6115913/8120527
Email: ananth.sarma@gmail.com agsarma@eim.ae
-- Regards,
A.G. Ananthasubramania Sarma
Tel: (00971) 2 6315826 (R) Mob: (00971)50-6115913/8120527
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:35:51 ART