From: David Prall (dcp@dcptech.com)
Date: Sun Mar 18 2007 - 21:33:08 ART
So "match access-group 1" and "access-list 1 permit any"
David
-- http://dcp.dcptech.com> -----Original Message----- > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On > Behalf Of Josef A > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 8:23 PM > To: David Prall > Cc: Heiko Liedtke; Matt Netw; ccielab@groupstudy.com > Subject: Re: match all ip traffic w any precedence > > Match any will also match non-ip traffic. > > thx > > > On 3/18/07, David Prall <dcp@dcptech.com> wrote: > > > > match any > > > > David > > > > > > > > -- > > http://dcp.dcptech.com > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On > > > Behalf Of Josef A > > > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 5:26 PM > > > To: Heiko Liedtke > > > Cc: Matt Netw; ccielab@groupstudy.com > > > Subject: Re: match all ip traffic w any precedence > > > > > > Rack2R1(config)#class-map match-any TEST > > > Rack2R1(config-cmap)#MA > > > Rack2R1(config-cmap)#ma > > > Rack2R1(config-cmap)#match ip > > > % Incomplete command. > > > > > > Rack2R1(config-cmap)#ma > > > Rack2R1(config-cmap)#match ip ? > > > dscp Match IP DSCP (DiffServ CodePoints) > > > precedence Match IP precedence > > > rtp Match RTP port nos > > > However, this is also an option: > > > > > > class-map match-any TEST > > > match ip precedence 0 1 3 4 > > > match ip precedence 5 6 7 > > > ! > > > ! > > > You can also use a rate-limit acl with a precedence mask > to match all > > > precedence: > > > > > > access-list rate-limit 1 mask FF > > > > > > class-map match-all TEST > > > match access-group 1 > > > ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/18/07, Heiko Liedtke <heiko.liedtke@gmx.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > hmmm does this make sense at all?? > > > > > > > > what about this > > > > > > > > class-map match-any ALLIPPRECEDENCE > > > > match ip > > > > > > > > ;-) > > > > > > > > heiko > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matt Netw schrieb: > > > > > > > > >Hi GS, > > > > > > > > > >is this good way for matching ALL IP TRAFFIC with ANY IP > > > PRECEDENCE?, or > > > > are > > > > >there another best way? > > > > > > > > > >class-map match-any ALLIPPRECEDENCE > > > > > match ip precedence 1 > > > > > match ip precedence 2 > > > > > match ip precedence 3 > > > > > match ip precedence 4 > > > > > match ip precedence 5 > > > > > match ip precedence 6 > > > > > match ip precedence 7 > > > > > match ip precedence 0 > > > > > > > > > >Thanks to all, > > > > > > > > > >Matt. > > > > > > > > > > > > >_____________________________________________________________ > > > __________ > > > > >Subscription information may be found at: > > > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > > _________ > > > > Subscription information may be found at: > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > > _________ > > > Subscription information may be found at: > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > _________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:35:51 ART