From: Antonio Soares (amsoares@netcabo.pt)
Date: Sun Mar 18 2007 - 19:24:54 ART
Dear GS,
Suppose this base configuration:
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 150.1.3.3 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address 204.12.1.3 255.255.255.0
!
interface Ethernet0/1
ip address 183.1.39.3 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial1/0
ip address 183.1.123.3 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
no frame-relay inverse-arp
!
interface Serial1/1
ip address 183.1.0.3 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
no frame-relay inverse-arp
!
router eigrp 100
network 183.1.123.3 0.0.0.0
no auto-summary
eigrp router-id 150.1.3.3
!
router ospf 1
router-id 150.1.3.3
network 150.1.3.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 183.1.0.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
!
1) Then you are asked to redistribute E0/0 and E0/1 into EIGRP:
!
route-map conn2eigrp permit 10
match interface Ethernet0/1 Ethernet0/0
!
!
router eigrp 100
redistribute connected route-map conn2eigrp
network 183.1.123.3 0.0.0.0
no auto-summary
eigrp router-id 150.1.3.3
!
2) The you are asked to redistribute OSPF into EIGRP:
!
router eigrp 100
redistribute connected route-map conn2eigrp
redistribute ospf 1 metric 10000 100 255 1 1500
network 183.1.123.3 0.0.0.0
no auto-summary
eigrp router-id 150.1.3.3
!
3) Now the problem:
Loopback0 and Serial1/1 are running OSPF but they won't be redistributed
into EIGRP. This is because we are only redistributing connected interfaces
Ethernet0/0 and Ethernet0/1.
Should we always reconfigure our route-map in order to have them
redistributed like this:
!
route-map conn2eigrp permit 10
match interface Ethernet0/1 Ethernet0/0 Serial1/1 Loopback0
!
Or if nothing is said about Optimal Routing/Redundancy, we shouldn't care
about it ?
Thanks.
Antonio
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:35:51 ART