From: Narbik Kocharians (narbikk@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Mar 13 2007 - 17:35:08 ART
If the task states that "R2 should NOT advertise it to ANY OF IT'S PEERS",
any of it's peer means potential IBGP and EBGP peers, so i would go with
no-advertise.
On 3/13/07, Jeff Mullan <jmullan78@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Folks,
> If I have a scenario like this :
>
> R1--R2--R3
>
> R1 AS 100
> R2 AS 200
> R3 AS 300
>
> R1s loopback say, 1.1.1.1/24 is being advertised via BGP to R2. If the
> task
> says " make sure R2 doesnt advertise it to any of its peer and make this
> change on R1" we will go ahead and set community to this route on R1. My
> question is, here, on R1 both no-export/no-advertise will do the trick.
> However, since there are no iBGP neigbours peering with R1, no-export will
> do the best solution. What do you guys think from exam perspective ? Will
> I
> loose points using no-advertise here ?
>
> Please note, task says " R1 should not advertise this to ANY PEER " but
> then
> we dont have any iBGP peers too .
> Thanks,
> -JM
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Narbik Kocharians CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security) CCSI# 30832 Network Learning, Inc. (CCIE class Instructor) www.ccbootcamp.com (CCIE Training)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:35:51 ART