RE: NBAR classification

From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Mar 13 2007 - 07:24:07 ART


Olayemi,

Thanks for your contributions to the subject. I read
them after I wrote my own review of the question.

Very good and very thorough.

Now I must ask:

Would you not use exactly the example I had used "for
cisco.com/univercd"?

Since that is all you wanted? "/univercd/*" vs.
"univercd/*" which in my mind mean to start with for
the match url.

And actually I might have to ask for clarification for
the "*" if I really wanted to ensure that I answered
exactly what was given and nothing more or less.

What would you say?

--- "Salau,Olayemi" <Olayemi.Salau@southampton.gov.uk>
wrote:

> Hello Jacque
>
>
>
> I would use:
>
> > match protocol http url "/univercd/*"
>
>
>
> Rather Than
>
> > match protocol http url "univercd/*"
>
>
>
> Check Out the following Groupstudy archives where I
> tried to explain few
> things about NBAR
>
>
>
>
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200701/msg00913.html
>
>
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200701/msg00952.html
>
>
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200701/msg00965.html
>
>
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200701/msg00971.html
>
>
>
>
>
> Many Thanks
>
> _________________________________________________
>
> Olayemi Salau
>
> Network Analyst
>
> I.T. Solutions Division
>
> Southampton City Council
>
> ( 023 8083 4070 7 077 8811 2036 3 079 5825 7509
>
> * olayemi.salau@southampton.gov.uk
>
> _________________________________________________
>
> This e-mail is intended for the addressee only. If
> you are not the
> intended recipient, please be aware that the
> unauthorised use or
> disclosure of the information it contains, or the
> unauthorised copying
> or re-transmission of the e-mail are strictly
> prohibited. Such action
> may result in legal proceedings. If the e-mail has
> been sent to you in
> error, please accept our apologies, advise the
> sender as soon as
> possible and then delete the message. Under the
> Freedom of Information
> Act 2000 / Data Protection Act 1998, the contents of
> this e-mail,
> whether it is marked confidential or otherwise, may
> be disclosed. No
> employee, Councillor or agent is authorised to
> conclude by e-mail any
> binding agreement with another party on behalf of
> Southampton City
> Council. The Council does not accept service by
> e-mail of court
> proceedings, other processes or formal notices of
> any kind without
> specific prior written agreement. E-mails to and
> from Southampton City
> Council may be monitored in accordance with the law
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Edouard Zorrilla
> Sent: 13 March 2007 09:46
> To: jacque vincent; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: NBAR classification
>
>
>
> Hello There,
>
>
>
> Besides why to use "bandwidth 80000" command and not
> "priority 80000" ?
> what
>
> is the difference between them ?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "jacque vincent" <jacque_vincent@hotmail.com>
>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 9:00 PM
>
> Subject: NBAR classification
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi If I was aske to reserve a bandwidth of 80 Kb
> HTTP traffic or
> files
>
> > being served from the
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/ directory; How
> would
>
> > configure this.
>
> >
>
> > I was thinking about the following:
>
> >
>
> > class-map match-all HTTP
>
> > match protocol http host "www.cisco.com"
>
> > match protocol http url "univercd/*"
>
> > policy-map POLICE
>
> > class HTTP
>
> > bandwidth 80000
>
> >
>
> > I was looking at the following page and I am
> getting confuse with NBAR
>
> > classification matching http protocol: ''match
> protocol http host''
> and
>
> > ''match protocol http url''
>
> >
>
> >
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios124/124cg/hq
> os_c/part05/ch05/hdtnbara.htm
>
> >
>
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >
>
> > One Care: free Trial Version Today!
>
> >
>
> >
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:35:51 ART