Re: shaping and FR

From: Prashant Shukla (shukla_cisco@yahoo.co.in)
Date: Fri Mar 09 2007 - 15:04:43 ART

• Next message: Jayson Tobias: "RE: spanning-tree portfast trunk"
• Previous message: nhatphuc: "spanning-tree portfast trunk"
• Maybe in reply to: Obi Nnaya: "shaping and FR"
• Next in thread: Obi Nnaya: "RE: shaping and FR"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Obi,

In case of FR traffic shaping, we generally give the service policy to the FR interface in order to impact all the traffic for that interface and in turn will impact all traffic for all DLCIs attached .

BUT, in case you have ,say, 3 DLCI for which you would like to use different shaping values for different DLCIs then we attached the service policy to the "interface-dlci" value rather than at interface level.

HTH

Shukla.

Obi Nnaya <obi.nnaya@nayatronix.com> wrote: Hi,

When shaping and there a FR interface involved, does it matter whether
the service-policy is applied to the physical interface or a map-class
applied to the frame-relay interface-dlci?

Thankyou

nayatronix

• Next message: Jayson Tobias: "RE: spanning-tree portfast trunk"
• Previous message: nhatphuc: "spanning-tree portfast trunk"
• Maybe in reply to: Obi Nnaya: "shaping and FR"
• Next in thread: Obi Nnaya: "RE: shaping and FR"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:35:50 ART