From: Andre Serrao (andreserrao@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 27 2007 - 06:27:51 ART
First Question:
Solutions guide shows new addresses added to tunnel interfaces (e.g.
148.1.13.1). That should NOT be correct, right? You have to use ip
unnumbered serial 0/0, in my opinion, since the real lab restricts us from
adding new addresses.
Rack1R1#
interface Tunnel0
ip unnumbered Serial0/0
ip pim dense-mode
tunnel source Loopback0
tunnel destination 150.1.3.3
Rack1R3#
interface Tunnel0
ip unnumbered Serial0/0.302
ip pim dense-mode
tunnel source Loopback0
tunnel destination 150.1.1.1
Second Question:
I am trying to verify if my answer is correct. My config is very similar to
the config in the solutions guide, except for the addressing of the tunnel.
Using the solutions guide method of verification, I get nothing.
Rack1R3#ping 224.6.6.6 repeat 5
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 224.6.6.6, timeout is 2 seconds:
.....
However, if I ping sourcing from my fa0/0 (where my server is supposed to
be), it does work (look output). So, what is the best method to verify this?
Which one proves that the config is right?
Rack1R3(config)#do ping
Protocol [ip]:
Target IP address: 224.6.6.6
Repeat count [1]:
Datagram size [100]:
Timeout in seconds [2]:
Extended commands [n]: y
Interface [All]: tunnel0
Time to live [255]:
Source address: 148.1.3.3
Type of service [0]:
Set DF bit in IP header? [no]:
Validate reply data? [no]:
Data pattern [0xABCD]:
Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]:
Sweep range of sizes [n]:
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 1, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 224.6.6.6, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 148.1.3.3
Reply to request 0 from 148.1.68.6, 96 ms
<<<<<------------------------------------------------------|
---------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:48 ART