From: ccie2006 ccie2006 (ccie2k7@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Feb 24 2007 - 08:06:08 ART
i think there shouldn't be any need of this as the local-as command is just to
assist during the transition phase of a merger of two different BGP AS
----- Original Message ----
From: Digital Yemeni <digital-yemeni@hotmail.com>
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 1:47:00 PM
Subject: BGP AS-No.
Hi Guys,
Someone has asked me if the following scenario
is "Solvable"
R1 (IP:1.1.1.1)
----------------------
router bgp 100
neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 200
R2 (IP:2.2.2.2)
----------------------
router bgp 200
neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 500 <---(intentional-mistake!)
Assuming that R1 does not know what the AS# that was configured on R2 - (if
R1 knows then it can use the "neighbor 2.2.2.2 local-as 500" command to
resolve the problem) - how can you figure out what AS# was configured on R2
so u can establish relationship?
Note: "debug ip bgp detail" won't show you
that!
I tried to see IF the "wrong AS# 500" shows up in any of the
communications
debugs between R1 and R2 when they hardly try to establish the
relationshops
but i could not succeed!! Is it really possible to detect what
AS# the
remote router has configured for our router?
Best Regards,
Digital
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
*****************************************************************************
******
*.* You'll NEVER succeed as a "CCIE" until you LOVE Cisco MORE than
your
sleep! *.*
*****************************************************************************
******
I'm expected to be busy for the next 57 years + CCIE preparation adds
on
that a bit. Therefore, please be concise on your email. Thank you!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:48 ART