From: Joe Yohannan (joe1265@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Feb 23 2007 - 10:34:12 ART
That is interesting to hear. I'm in the same boat as Deji. I got 0% on
multicast and I feel it was 100%. I read the questions over and verified
several times. It was right.
- Joe Yo
>From: Blastmor <alextols@gmail.com>
>Reply-To: Blastmor <alextols@gmail.com>
>To: "Deji Steve-Fagbemi" <deji500@hotmail.com>
>CC: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>, "Narbik Kocharians"
><narbikk@gmail.com>, "Lou Ioanni" <louisccie_r_s@yahoo.com>,
>BitGossip <bit.gossip@chello.nl>, "Cisco certification"
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: regrading
>Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:20:07 +0300
>
>Everyone I know who tried to pass recently and got 0% in multicast after
>regrading got points (even 100% for section)
>
>2007/2/23, Deji Steve-Fagbemi <deji500@hotmail.com>:
> >
> > Scott,
> >
> > Is that not saying something about the process of grading the CCIE lab?
>It
> > means that there is no consistency. If you got points that you didn't
>have
> > originally and you lost points that you had originally, then the process
> > of
> > grading labs requires some analysis.
> >
> > I had my first attempt last month and I got 0% for multicast and I am
> > almost
> > certain that I completed both tasks in my multicast. Do they use
>computers
> > to grade? If so, how can a computer grade accurately?
> >
> > If you do not get detailed score reports then how can you challenge your
> > score if you feel you have passed?
> > At least if you are at University and you feel that you didn't do as
>well
> > as
> > you hoped, you can apply to the exam board and get some other tutor to
> > regrade.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Scott Morris
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 9:02 PM
> > To: 'Narbik Kocharians'
> > Cc: 'Blastmor'; 'Lou Ioanni'; 'BitGossip'; 'Cisco certification'
> > Subject: RE: regrading
> >
> > Nope, but I got back the points I was irritated for not getting. But I
> > lost
> > some other points which kinda pissed me off. But I passed the next
>time,
> > so
> > it wasn't the end of the world.
> >
> > ;)
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Narbik Kocharians [mailto:narbikk@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 3:55 PM
> > To: Scott Morris
> > Cc: Blastmor; Lou Ioanni; BitGossip; Cisco certification
> > Subject: Re: regrading
> >
> >
> > Scott, Did you pass after the regrade?
> >
> >
> > On 2/22/07, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> >
> > I did not get that on my regrade, but that was also three years ago...
> >
> > _____
> >
> > From: Blastmor [mailto: alextols@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 2:39 PM
> > To: Scott Morris
> > Cc: Lou Ioanni; BitGossip; Cisco certification
> > Subject: Re: regrading
> >
> >
> > You will receive table with was/now points on each section
> >
> >
> > 2007/2/22, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com>:
> >
> > You will get a score report, just like the first time around. And you
>MAY
> > see differences in the values.
> >
> > You will not, however, get any detailed feedback or specific listings of
> > what you missed.
> >
> > The score report is only meant to let you know 'areas' that you may need
> > additional work in, not give you details.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> >
> > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>JNCIE
> > #153, CISSP, et al.
> > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> > IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
> > IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> > smorris@ipexpert.com
> > http://www.ipexpert.com
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Lou
> > Ioanni
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 1:08 PM
> > To: BitGossip; Cisco certification
> > Subject: Re: regrading
> >
> > I do not think so. If you fail you will see the percentages of your
>score
> > in
> > all areas tested, but if you regrade (you will pay for that) then they
> > will
> > just let you know if you passed or failed (as far as I know).
> >
> >
> > Loizos Y.
> > CCIE#10702 R & S
> >
> > BitGossip <bit.gossip@chello.nl> wrote:
> > Group,
> >
> > In case I ask to regrade my lab is it possible that they tell you what I
> > did
> >
> > wrong?
> >
> > I think it will be very useful to know that because I really can't
>figure
> > out myself what I did wrong and I don't want to do it again next time.
> >
> > Luca.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Bored stiff? Loosen up...
> > Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > SY, Alexey
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Narbik Kocharians
> > CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> > CCSI# 30832
> > Network Learning, Inc. (CCIE class Instructor)
> > www.ccbootcamp.com (CCIE Training)
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
>
>
>--
>SY, Alexey
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:48 ART