From: Dumb Dumb (dumb4me@rediffmail.com)
Date: Fri Feb 23 2007 - 04:55:44 ART
Hi,
I have a doubt regarding static route. I just went through one
document for which the link is given below.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094195.
shtml
As per the above document static routes pointing to next-hop ip
address will have administratice distance of 1 and those pointing to outgoing
interface is having administrativedistance of 0. But this is not case when I
tried to configure.
I have a directly connected multilink and I am
configuring a static route pointing to this multilink.
RINCHNLKB-2A-1750#sh
ip int brief
Multilink1 192.168.45.30 YES NVRAM up
up
RINCHNLKB-2A-1750(config)#ip route 20.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 multilink 1
RINCHNLKB-2A-1750(config)#^Z
RINCHNLKB-2A-1750#sh ip route | include
20.0.0.0
20.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
S 20.0.0.0 is directly
connected, Multilink1
RINCHNLKB-2A-1750#sh ip route 20.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
Routing entry for 20.0.0.0/24
Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0
(connected)
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* directly connected, via
Multilink1
Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
Now you can see
that AD for this route is 1 instead of 0. Can somebody throw some light into
this ?
Thanks,
Pete
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:48 ART