From: Josef A (josefnet@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Feb 11 2007 - 14:59:20 ART
On 2/11/07, Josef A <josefnet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think this an application of NAT redundancy. You can have a scenario
> with two or more NAT outside interfaces, you can configure NAT to translate
> source addresses using the currently active OUTSIDE interface with the
> overload option. You will configure two ip nat inside statements each with
> its own route-map matching the source network and outside interface, with
> the overload option.
>
> If you show ip nat translations, you will notice that NAT is overloading
> on the currently active OUTSIDE interface. If you shut down the currently
> active interface, and clear all nat translations, you will notice the
> failover to the other interface.
>
> Hope this helps
> Josef
>
>
>
>
> On 2/11/07, Shamin <ccie.xpert@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am also stuck with the same issue. I do not understand the use of
> > two
> > match statements in the route map,One for the range of IPs to match and
> > the
> > other for the the outgoing interface.
> > And the route map is put in the ip nat statement after inside source.
> >
> > Please can any one explain this, I have read through all the FAQ's in
> > the
> > Cisco DOC website ,still cant get this out,.
> >
> > regards
> > Shamin
> >
> >
> > On 2/9/07, nhatphuc <nhatphuc@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Joe,
> > > This is my configuration:
> > > int f0/0
> > > ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
> > > ip nat inside
> > >
> > > int s0/0
> > > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > > ip nat outside
> > >
> > > int s0/1
> > > ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
> > > ip nat outside
> > >
> > > access-list 1 permit 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255
> > > route-map INT0
> > > match ip address 1
> > > match int s0/0 (versus: set int s0/0)
> > >
> > > route-map INT1
> > > match ip address 1
> > > match int s0/1 (versus: set int s0/1)
> > >
> > > ip nat inside source route-map INT0 interface s0/0 overload
> > > ip nat inside source route-map INT1 interface s0/1 overload
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Phuc
> > >
> > > On 2/9/07, Joe Chang <changjoe@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Phuc,
> > > >
> > > > Can you show me the rest of the configuration ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Joe
> > > >
> > > > CCIE 16805
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "nhatphuc" < nhatphuc@gmail.com >
> > > > To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 7:34 AM
> > > > Subject: NAT using route-map
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > HI Group,
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you give me an example to make clear the purpose of the 2
> > > following
> > > > > route-maps?
> > > > >
> > > > > route-map TEST1
> > > > > match network ....
> > > > > match interface ....
> > > > >
> > > > > route-map TEST2
> > > > > match network ....
> > > > > set interface ....
> > > > >
> > > > > This route-map used in NAT to set the outgoing interface.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > Phuc
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:46 ART