From: Marvin Greenlee (marvingreenlee@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Feb 08 2007 - 19:58:17 ART
Terminal services is much more sensitive about latency
than bandwidth. How many users do you have at each of
the locations that are accessing the terminal
services? During internal tests, Microsoft had
something like 10 users on a 56k link with windows
2003.
What was the setup before? Were users only connecting
to the head office for applications? Are you split
tunneling on the concentrator so only traffic to the
head office is tunneled, and internet traffic passes
via the local internet connection?
Do you have the ability to enable NBAR or netflow on
the egress router at the head office site to see what
the outgoing traffic is?
Marvin Greenlee
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
"When Will You Be an IP Expert?!"
marvin@ipexpert.com
http://www.IPexpert.com
--- Mohammad Saeed <mzsaeed@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Every One,
>
> I setup VPN3000 with 5 VPN3002 HW clients in remote
> offices
> establishing tunnles to VPN3000 over the internet.
> Now users from
> behind one and some time two 3002 cleints, when they
> try to access
> Windows Terminal Services in the Head Office from
> behind 3000,
> response is painfully slow. Before this VPN Setup
> the response was
> fine. Now tunnel is up, they can access any machine
> in Head Office.
> The users behind rest of the 3 HW cleints are fine
> and response of
> same Terminal Services is fine.
>
> Do you think if I setup bandwidth policy under
> Configuration->Ploicy
> Management-> Traffic Management -> Bandwidth Policy
> and set minimum
> bandwith to may be 128Kbps per session, would that
> help???
>
> The Head Office is connected using DLS link at 4Mbps
> and sites are
> connecting at 2Mbps to the Internet.
>
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mohammad Zahed Saeed
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:46 ART