Re: Don't need both unicast and multicast BGP routes?

From: nhatphuc (nhatphuc@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Feb 08 2007 - 09:27:09 ART

• Next message: nhatphuc: "NAT using route-map"
• Previous message: Deji Steve-Fagbemi: "RE: Route Filtering using Prefix Lis"
• Maybe in reply to: nhatphuc: "Don't need both unicast and multicast BGP routes?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

After checking again, I understand

Thanks

On 2/8/07, nhatphuc <nhatphuc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Group,
>
> If a multicast source network is advertised as unicast BGP. Do I have to
> advertise it as multicast BGP?
>
> In my configiration, Just unicast BGP route is enough for RPF check.
> And as I tested, Multicast BGP Route is used only when there's no unicast
> BGP route for the source.
>
> Am I right?
>
> Thanks
>
> Phuc

• Next message: nhatphuc: "NAT using route-map"
• Previous message: Deji Steve-Fagbemi: "RE: Route Filtering using Prefix Lis"
• Maybe in reply to: nhatphuc: "Don't need both unicast and multicast BGP routes?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:46 ART