From: Mohammad Saeed (mzsaeed@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Feb 07 2007 - 19:44:47 ART
Is there any way to avoid this summary address?
Regards,
Mohammad Zahed Saeed
On 2/7/07, David Prall <dcp@dcptech.com> wrote:
> Redistribute connected
>
> Your getting 149.1.0.0/24 from local because it is a connected interface.
> You have a neighbor 149.1.0.8 and neighbor 149.1.0.6 on this interface.
>
> --
> http://dcp.dcptech.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> > Behalf Of Mohammad Saeed
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 5:13 PM
> > To: Bob Watson
> > Cc: Cisco certification
> > Subject: Re: no auto-summary under BGP
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now here is the BGP config of R5 and I have added no
> > auto-summary in it but still it has summary network address
> > in its BGP table??? How R5 is getting this 149.1.0.0, I don't
> > understand, can any one explain?
> >
> >
> > router bgp 100
> > no synchronization
> > bgp router-id 150.1.5.5
> > bgp log-neighbor-changes
> > redistribute connected route-map CONNECTEDTOBGP neighbor
> > 149.1.0.6 remote-as 100 neighbor 149.1.0.6
> > route-reflector-client neighbor 149.1.0.8 remote-as 100
> > neighbor 149.1.0.8 route-reflector-client neighbor
> > 149.1.254.3 remote-as 200 neighbor 150.1.4.4 remote-as 100
> > neighbor 150.1.4.4 update-source Loopback0 neighbor
> > 150.1.4.4 route-reflector-client no auto-summary !
> >
> > and here is partial out put of bgo table of R5.....
> >
> > R5# sh ip bgp
> >
> > * 149.1.254.3 0 200 54 i
> > *>i119.0.0.0 149.1.0.6 0 100 0 54 i
> > * 149.1.254.3 0 200 54 i
> > *> 149.1.0.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ?
> > *> 149.1.7.0/24 149.1.254.3 0 200 300 ?
> > *>i149.1.8.0/24 149.1.0.8 0 100 0 ?
> > r>i149.1.44.0/24 150.1.4.4 0 100 0 ?
> > *> 149.1.77.0/24 149.1.254.3 0 200 300 ?
> > *>i149.1.88.0/24 149.1.0.8 0 100 0 ?
> > *> 149.1.123.0/24 149.1.254.3 0 200 300 ?
> > *> 149.1.127.0/24 149.1.254.3 0 200 300 ?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Mohammad Zahed Saeed
> >
> >
> > On 2/6/07, Mohammad Saeed <mzsaeed@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Thank you very much Bob....
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Mohammad Zahid Saeed
> > >
> > > On 2/6/07, Bob Watson <watson.robert@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > none as your not advertising or redistributing any
> > subprefix routes
> > > >
> > > > from the doccd
> > > >
> > > > auto-summary (BGP)
> > > >
> > > > To configure automatic summarization of subnet routes into
> > > > network-level routes, use the auto-summary command in
> > address family
> > > > or router configuration mode. To disable automatic
> > summarization and
> > > > send subprefix routing information across classful network
> > > > boundaries, use the no form of this command.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2/6/07, Mohammad Saeed <mzsaeed@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello Every Body,
> > > > >
> > > > > Can some body tell me the what differnce this no
> > auto-summary will
> > > > > make under bgp configuration...
> > > > >
> > > > > conf t
> > > > > router bgp 100
> > > > > bgp router-id 150.1.5.5
> > > > > no synch
> > > > > neighbor 149.1.254.3 remote-as 200 neighbor 150.1.4.4 remote-as
> > > > > 100 neighbor 150.1.4.4 update-source lo0 neighbor 150.1.4.4
> > > > > route-reflector-client neighbor 149.1.0.6 remote-as 100
> > neighbor
> > > > > 149.1.0.6 route-reflector-client neighbor 149.1.0.8
> > remote-as 100
> > > > > neighbor 149.1.0.8 route-reflector-client
> > > > > no auto-summary ??????
> > > > > end
> > > > > wr
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Mohammad Zahed Saeed
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > > > ___
> > > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > _________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:46 ART