From: nhatphuc (nhatphuc@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Feb 03 2007 - 12:19:11 ART
Hi Steve,
This is NAT. I don't think setting virtual IP is correct.
Can you explain why you do that?
In my case, everything is OK if I add 192.168.2.5 to router.
Thanks
Phuc
On 2/3/07, steve <router.mou@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I think you need to set a virtual ip add 192.168.2.5 for the three server
> inside.
> Regards
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> nhatphuc
> Sent: 2007年2月3日 17:55
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: NAT Load Balancing
>
> HI Group,
>
> I configured NAT Load Balancing as follow:
>
> interface g0/0
> ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
> ip nat inside
>
> interface g0/1
> ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
> ip nat outside
>
> ip nat pool SERVER 192.168.1.2 192.168.1.4 prefix-length 24 type rotary
> ip nat inside destination list 1 pool SERVER
> access-list 1 permit 192.168.2.5
>
>
> From PC (192.168.2.2), I can't access servers inside unless I add a
> secondary address 192.168.2.5 to interface g0/1
>
> Do I miss something? Or this works as designed?
> In static NAT, there's no need to create a second IP Address. The router
> automatically answers ARP Request.
>
> As I tested and read from books, this feature doesn't support UDP traffic.
> Is this true? Or Cisco has updated the IOS to support UDP?
>
> Thanks
>
> Phuc
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:45 ART