From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Mon Jan 29 2007 - 12:43:58 ART
They look the same as far as a route goes, except like you note that the
cost increases on an E1. Otherwise, they have the same characteristics as
far as whether they're allowed in certain area types (or not), and how the
next-hop information is handled.
You'll see them in your routing table as O E1 or O E2 routes. :)
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Edouard Zorrilla
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 7:49 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: security@groupstudy.com
Subject: OSPF External Types
Hello There,
I would like to know the difference between E1 and E2 (default) external
types ? For instance I know that OE1 add the internal cost of each link it
crosses and OE2 does not. Let me know if there is something beyond this.
Also, how can I change the default behaviour, I mean what can I do so that I
see in my routing table a E1 instead a E2 ? Any exaple would be appreciate.
Regards
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 08 2007 - 23:46:57 ART