From: Ronnie Angello (ronnie.angello@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Jan 12 2007 - 12:52:44 ART
Same feature and same command but this is from the actual 6500 config
guide. Sorry, I was pressed for time before so you got the result of the
quick Google search.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/122sx/swcg/stp_enha.htm#wp1020683
On 1/11/07, Ronnie Angello <ronnie.angello@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Take a look at the Etherchannel Guard STP feature.
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/metro/me2400/12225ex/2400scg/swstpopt.htm#wp1113708
>
>
> On 1/11/07, fferrer10@vodafone.es <fferrer10@vodafone.es> wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys:
> >
> > We have a server farm with a lot of blade servers connected to several
> > Catalyst 6500 switches through the respective blade-switches, and using
> > channeling to give extra-bandwidth to the server connections.
> >
> > Yerterday, a misconfiguration on a newly added fiber channel was
> > traduced on "merging" 2 vlans in a layer 3 loop, making the 6500 giga
> > interfaces going to very high level utilization and causing a general
> > "outage" of 15 minutes on all the server environment, not only on the
> > equipment of the 2 vlans affected by the misconfig.
> >
> > Anyone knows effective solutions to minimize the impact of these
> > misconfigs errors on critical environments? We are rate-limiting the % of
> > bandwith allowed for broadcasts & multicasts on the core & distribution
> > links of the farm, but we don't know if there are more efficient solutions
> > to these problems.
> >
> > Regards and TIA
> >
> > Juan
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 08 2007 - 23:46:56 ART