Re: Logging to NVRAM or to FLASH

From: Chee Chew Leong (cleong3@csc.com)
Date: Thu Jan 11 2007 - 04:22:45 ART

Next message: Karl Brenner: "RE: Logging to NVRAM or to FLASH"
Previous message: V Shekhar: "Local Authorization V/S TACACS authorization."
Maybe in reply to: Noel Debouver III: "Logging to NVRAM or to FLASH"
Next in thread: Karl Brenner: "RE: Logging to NVRAM or to FLASH"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Is it possible to log to flash by using logging buffered? More seriously
on nvram? Possible?

Logging buffer should be logging to RAM.

Noel Debouver III <noeldebouveriii@yahoo.com>
Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
01/06/2007 12:39 PM
Please respond to
Noel Debouver III <noeldebouveriii@yahoo.com>

To
ccielab@groupstudy.com
cc

Subject
Re: Logging to NVRAM or to FLASH

When one uses the command logging buffered 55000 - it logs to Flash.

When one
uses the command logging persistent <device name> - Does one need both
commads
and does one also have to use the logging persistent command to write to
NVRAM?

----- Original Message ----
From: Noel Debouver III
<noeldebouveriii@yahoo.com>
To: Noel Debouver III <noeldebouveriii@yahoo.com>;
Ivan <ivan@iip.net>; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Friday, January 5, 2007
8:08:07 PM
Subject: Logging to NVRAM or to FLASH

Is anyone logging to NVRAM
or Flash?

Any tips here on making this work
correctly?

Thanks

Noel

Next message: Karl Brenner: "RE: Logging to NVRAM or to FLASH"
Previous message: V Shekhar: "Local Authorization V/S TACACS authorization."
Maybe in reply to: Noel Debouver III: "Logging to NVRAM or to FLASH"
Next in thread: Karl Brenner: "RE: Logging to NVRAM or to FLASH"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 08 2007 - 23:46:56 ART