From: Vincent Mashburn (vmashburn@fedex.com)
Date: Tue Jan 09 2007 - 12:19:13 ART
Have you tried making the router a EIGRP "stub"?
Vince Mashburn
Sr. Voice / Data Engineer
901-263-5072
CCVP, CCNP
Cisco IP Telephony Support Specialist
Cisco IP Telephony Operations Specialist
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Bit Gossip
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 8:34 AM
To: groupstudy
Subject: RE: EIGRP hop count
Group,
the reason why I was trying to increase the hop-count of specific
prefixes was that I was trying to stop the router advertising them
without using any filter list: this was the request. So i thought to set
the hop-count to max which means unreachable.
I don't know if it is possible to do the same with the EIGRP compound
metric; I tried to set the metric to the max possible value but still
those prefixes were advertised. So I guess that EIGRP has not such a
thing as unreachable metric value
Thanks,
Luca
On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 09:07 -0500, Scott Morris wrote:
> It is just used to set up a larger limit on routes. That's it. It's
just a
> small check to make sure your network isn't TOO big. :)
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
JNCIE
> #153, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development
> IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> smorris@ipexpert.com
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Xiangling
> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 5:51 AM
> To: Bit Gossip
> Cc: groupstudy'
> Subject: Re: EIGRP hop count
>
> Sorry but the point is why you need to manipulate it? EIGRP does not
take
> into route selection or unreachability judgement, nor does it take hop
count
> as other kind of reference. So why bother? If you die hard want it
you can
> set your bandwidth to a unique value to all participating interface,
and set
> an appropriate K value to make your metric to 1 for each hop. Then
you can
> use offset-list to change it as you want. But... anyway, if you die
hard
> want it why not use RIP?
>
> Regards,
> Xiangling
>
>
> On 1/7/07, Bit Gossip <bit.gossip@chello.nl> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry Scott,
> > but what you are pointing out is 'metric maximum-hops' which dosn't
> > manipulate the hop-count of a route!
> > The reason why I am asking the group 'how to manipulate the eigrp
> > hop-count' is that I couldn't find any hint on the DocCD!
> > Thanks,
> > Luca
> >
> > On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 11:09 -0500, Scott Morris wrote:
> > > I'd probably look on the DocCD under the Command Reference...
> > > Perhaps
> > going
> > > to the IP Routing Protocols section and looking at EIGRP Commands.
> > >
> > > Perhaps a Ctrl-F for "hop" or "hop count" would help things out
> > there? :)
> > >
> > >
> >
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios124/124cr/
> > hirp_r
> > > /rte_eih.htm#wp1000064
> > >
> > > Sometimes it good to figure out what keywords are important to
help
> > > you search for things. Nobody will ever memorize all of the
> > > commands. Even after all these years, I still look things up
(most
> > > likely 'cause I
> > killed
> > > too many brain cells at an earlier age, but that's a different
story!
> > > (grin))
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > >
> > >
> > > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider)
#4713,
> > JNCIE
> > > #153, CISSP, et al.
> > > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> > > IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development IPexpert Sr. Technical
> > > Instructor smorris@ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
Behalf
> > > Of
> > Bit
> > > Gossip
> > > Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 10:39 AM
> > > To: groupstudy
> > > Subject: EIGRP hop count
> > >
> > > Hi group,
> > > is there any way to manipulate hop count in eigrp?
> > > I noticed that offset-list manipulates the composite metric but
NOT
> > > hop-count!
> > > Thanks,
> > > Luca
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 08 2007 - 23:46:56 ART