Re: FRTS Question: Is the Bc always necessary?

From: Ryan (ryan95842@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Jan 07 2007 - 16:04:32 ART


Thanks guys. It's just confusing to me since it will put a value in if I
don't specify one, so in my mind, if it only asks for one value, I should be
safe and configure only the one value.

Of course the last thing I want to do is lose points because of what I think
the answer should be...

-Ryan

On 1/6/07, Xiangling <xianglingzj@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Default Tc = 0.125s or 125ms
> Thus bc will still be 16000 if you don't put-in anything. I see no reason
> to lose mark on this if the answer should be as shown. Unless the answer is
> wrong and there is some other restriction/requirement in the question so
> that you must not have a Tc of 125 or a Bc of 16000 bits. But just as Scott
> said, overconfiguration will never cost you marks (provide the "answer"
> given is correct)
>
>
> On 1/7/07, Ryan <ryan95842@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > FRTS Question: Is the Bc always necessary?
> >
> > Just did a Frame-Relay Traffic shaping Task. The task says to provision
> > each
> > circuit as the CIR of 128k.
> >
> > Since no other requirements were listed, I did just that:
> >
> > !
> > map-class frame-relay FRTS
> > frame-relay cir 128000
> > frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn
> > !
> >
> > In the solution, the Bc was defined.
> > !
> > map-class frame-relay FRTS
> > frame-relay cir 128000
> > frame-relay bc 16000
> > !
> >
> > Is it necessary to always manually define the Bc for the lab? Is this a
> > best
> > practice?
> > or is the default Bc ok if the task does not ask for it?
> > Would I have lost points for adding in the adaptive-shaping?
> >
> >
> >
> > -Ryan
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
> Xiangling
> |-------------------------|
> | |
> \ I Love You All /
> \ /
> \___________/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 08 2007 - 23:46:55 ART