From: Frank (ocsic@web.de)
Date: Thu Jan 04 2007 - 11:30:57 ART
Guyler, Rik schrieb:
Well, exaclt that was what i thought about this.
That matches the mask and also the interface. But most people think
differnt, seems like.
Frank
> The router won't support more than one address in the same subnet on two
> different interfaces. At least that used to be a Cisco "golden rule" and as
> far as I know, still is.
>
> I believe "network 150.1.1.1 0.0.0.255" is correct, which is an exact match
> between both the network statement and the interface.
>
> Rik
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Salau,Olayemi
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 8:26 AM
> To: Frank
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: RE: ospf wildcard bits
>
> I would use
>
>
>
> router ospf 1
>
> netwo 150.1.1.1 0.0.0.0
>
>
>
> Remember under OSPF, network command enables routing process on specified
> "interface", and not network.
>
> If you use 150.1.1.1 0.0.0.255, you're literally saying enable ospf on all
> interfaces within the 150.1.1.0 network. What if there is another interface
> 150.1.1.3 on this router in which you're not required to run OSPF on?
>
>
>
> So I would say use network 150.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area X in other to match
> interface exactly.
>
>
>
> Many Thanks
>
> _________________________________________________
>
> Olayemi Salau
>
> Network Analyst
>
> I.T. Solutions Division
>
> Southampton City Council
>
> ( 023 8083 4070 7 077 8811 2036 3 079 5825 7509
>
> * olayemi.salau@southampton.gov.uk
>
> _________________________________________________
>
> This e-mail is intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please be aware that the unauthorised use or disclosure of the
> information it contains, or the unauthorised copying or re-transmission of
> the e-mail are strictly prohibited. Such action may result in legal
> proceedings. If the e-mail has been sent to you in error, please accept our
> apologies, advise the sender as soon as possible and then delete the
> message. Under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 / Data Protection Act
> 1998, the contents of this e-mail, whether it is marked confidential or
> otherwise, may be disclosed. No employee, Councillor or agent is authorised
> to conclude by e-mail any binding agreement with another party on behalf of
> Southampton City Council. The Council does not accept service by e-mail of
> court proceedings, other processes or formal notices of any kind without
> specific prior written agreement. E-mails to and from Southampton City
> Council may be monitored in accordance with the law
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Frank
> Sent: 04 January 2007 12:53
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: ospf wildcard bits
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> what does it mean if i have configure ospf network statements to "match
>
> the interface exaclty"?
>
>
>
> interface s0/0
>
> ip add 150.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
>
>
>
> router ospf 1
>
> netwo 150.1.1.1 0.0.0.0
>
>
>
> or
>
>
>
> router ospf 1
>
> netwo 150.1.1.1 0.0.0.255
>
>
>
> The first configuration does match the ip address exactly and the second
>
>
> does match the netmask directly.
>
> What should you choose. I know both are valid, but what would be the
>
> right one regarding to "exaclty
>
> match the interface"?
>
>
>
>
>
> Frank
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
>
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 08 2007 - 23:46:55 ART