From: Angelo De Guzman (a.deguzman@wesolv.ph.fujitsu.com)
Date: Tue Jan 02 2007 - 01:01:00 ART
Same here.. I tried this as well and sometimes could not get the desired
results. Maybe there is an IOS issue for this I remember reading this as well.
Try to research the archive and you could find what you're looking for.
Angelo De Guzman, CCIE No. 16887
Ronnie Angello (1/2/2007 11:53 AM):
>Yes, but it doesn't work as expected. On the hub I configure 'neighbor
>x.x.x.x pri 0' for each spoke neighbor. Each spoke still participates in DR
>election. The only way that I get the desired result is to configure 'ip
>ospf priority 0' on the serial interface of each spoke.
>
>On 2 Jan 2007 11:31:00 +0800, Angelo De Guzman <
>a.deguzman@wesolv.ph.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>
>> If the task says you cant configure the priority on the interface then
>> this
>> could be another way of doing it.
>>
>> Ronnie Angello (1/2/2007 11:15 AM):
>> >The default is 0, but you must configure the neighbor's interface with
>> >priority 0 to keep the router from participating in DR election. I'm
>> with
>> >you...what's the use of configuring the priority with the neighbor
>> command
>> >if you have to configure it on the interface anyway?
>> >
>> >On 1/1/07, Bit Gossip <bit.gossip@chello.nl> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I am very confused on the matter after the following lab setup:
>> >>
>> >> interface Serial0/0
>> >> ip address 192.168.192.6 255.255.255.0
>> >> ip ospf network non-broadcast
>> >> ...
>> >> router ospf 6
>> >> neighbor 192.168.192.3
>> >> ...
>> >>
>> >> According to doc, default priority for the neighbor statement is 0 so
>> >> 192.168.192.3 should have priority 0; instead:
>> >>
>> >> r6#show ip ospf neighbor 192.168.118.3
>> >> Neighbor 192.168.118.3, interface address 192.168.192.3
>> >> In the area 0 via interface Serial0/0
>> >> Neighbor priority is 1 (configured 0), State is FULL, 18 state
>> >>
>> >> Where is this priority 1 coming from? Maybe the default priority
>> applied
>> >> at the interface of 192.168.192.3?
>> >>
>> >> But this is not logical because the neighbor statement, being more
>> >> specific should prevail over the interface priority....
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Luca.
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________________________________
>> >Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 08 2007 - 23:46:55 ART