From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon Jan 01 2007 - 14:30:00 ART
There maybe more configuration added after the virtual-link is up. It's
highly recommended that you build your network in this fashion. Make a
network that works not one that you break and then fix ;-)
HTH,
Brian Dennis, CCIE4 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ronnie Angello
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 8:40 AM
To: KSGoh
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: virtual-link
What are you trying to link to area 0? It looks like area 45 and area
46
are both already connected to area 0.
On 1/1/07, KSGoh <kianseng.goh@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> any idea why the vitual link is down, down ?
>
> R4
>
> router ospf 100
> router-id 150.1.1.4
> log-adjacency-changes
> area 46 virtual-link 150.1.1.6
> network 150.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> network 183.1.0.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> network 183.1.45.0 0.0.0.255 area 45
> network 183.1.46.0 0.0.0.255 area 46
> neighbor 183.1.45.5
>
> R6
> router ospf 100
> router-id 150.1.1.6
> log-adjacency-changes
> area 46 virtual-link 150.1.1.4
> network 150.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 46
> network 183.1.46.0 0.0.0.255 area 46
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 08 2007 - 23:46:55 ART