RE: VRF NAT

From: Zahid Hassan (zhassan@gmx.net)
Date: Fri Dec 29 2006 - 11:28:01 ART

• Next message: prashant shukla: "EIGRP_over 2-Tunnels, complains " not on common subnet"."
• Previous message: jay buss: "VRF NAT"
• Maybe in reply to: jay buss: "VRF NAT"
• Next in thread: Hohstadt, Mitchell G Mr CTNOSC: "RE: VRF NAT"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Jay,

I am doing VRF aware NAT on a PE without LDP/TDP (VRF lite) for Colo
customer management.
This is to provide management services to customers hosted at the Colo.
This VRF NAT PE translates customer's private subnets to be able to connect
to our management network.

In principal, VRF NAT is nothing other then NAT implementation on VRF
enabled interfaces.

Let me know if you are interested to see few config examples.

Regards,

Zahid

CCIE # 14103

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
jay buss
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 2:09 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: VRF NAT

Hi Guys,

Does anyone have any good examples on how to do VRF NAT.

I would like to hide all VRF traffic behind a global address on a PE, anyone
any idea?

Regards and thanks

• Next message: prashant shukla: "EIGRP_over 2-Tunnels, complains " not on common subnet"."
• Previous message: jay buss: "VRF NAT"
• Maybe in reply to: jay buss: "VRF NAT"
• Next in thread: Hohstadt, Mitchell G Mr CTNOSC: "RE: VRF NAT"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:39 ART