NAT Exemption

From: V Shekhar (vshekhar25@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Dec 14 2006 - 07:54:04 ART

• Next message: Rajan kumaresan: "Re: Cisco VPN3000 DNS Problem"
• Previous message: Abu Hamzah: "Ethernet Frame Structure vs IP Packet Structure"
• Next in thread: Bill Wharton: "RE: NAT Exemption"
• Maybe reply: Bill Wharton: "RE: NAT Exemption"
• Maybe reply: Kal Han: "Re: NAT Exemption"
• Maybe reply: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: NAT Exemption"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I was trying out the NAT exemption scenarios.
I have a Q in this regard.
Do we really have to use "static" wlong with NAT 0?
I thought Just by adding the NAT 0 the outside inteerface would reply for arp queries for the internal host.

any working config would be of help.
Thanx.
-sHekHar.

• Next message: Rajan kumaresan: "Re: Cisco VPN3000 DNS Problem"
• Previous message: Abu Hamzah: "Ethernet Frame Structure vs IP Packet Structure"
• Next in thread: Bill Wharton: "RE: NAT Exemption"
• Maybe reply: Bill Wharton: "RE: NAT Exemption"
• Maybe reply: Kal Han: "Re: NAT Exemption"
• Maybe reply: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: NAT Exemption"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:38 ART