From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Dec 12 2006 - 23:54:01 ART
Bob,
I must say your Frame Relay Vods are quite excellent
and comprehensive so far, so much so that even though
I have gotten all of my points on two labs so far for
Frame, I see some benefit to finishing the series.
The explanations are clear and concise and help
complete my understanding of the subject-matter.
Looking forward to more topics.
Everyone is looking forward to switching, I'm sure.
--- Bob Sinclair <bsinclair@netmasterclass.net> wrote:
> Darby,
>
> Over this past month I have been working with
> well-prepared students here at
> NMC to help them cope with 4-switch scenarios. From
> what I have seen,
> students who are in the habit of creating good VLAN
> diagrams cope well.
> Students who think they don't have time to diagram
> the VLANs do not.
>
> The challenge is primarily one of organizing the
> information. Candidates
> need to develop good diagramming skills in order to
> succeed. In addition,
> the 4-switch scenario increases the early
> configuration burden - it is just
> a lot more layer-2 work that needs to be done.
>
>
> Just my 2 cents!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Darby Weaver
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 8:52 AM
> To: Kenza@kenza.nl; groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com;
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
>
> Is it really that much more difficult with an extra
> switch or two?
>
> Hmmm...
>
> Well I guess if one introduces the criss-cross for
> redundancy.
>
> Maybe if one gets more explicit in terms of
> spanning-tree.
>
> Trunking should not pose that many more challenges.
>
> QoS could get more interesting.
>
> VTP - Could get more interesting - but it is
> relatively simple as-is - so if you had two switches
> or 50 it should not matter as much.
>
> I would actually think that it would be more welcome
> as more points would directed towards switching.
>
> Exactly what are you worried about getting more
> complex?
>
> DTP?
>
>
>
>
> --- "Kenza@kenza.nl" <sales@kenza.nl> wrote:
>
> > yes i know, but it get complex when you have 3 or
> 4
> > switches, more
> > diffuclties then when you have just 2 switches.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tony Schaffran"
> <groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com>
> > To: "'Kenza@kenza.nl'" <sales@kenza.nl>;
> > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 1:35 PM
> > Subject: RE: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
> >
> >
> > > No need to get hung up on the actual number of
> > switches.
> > >
> > > Spanning-tree is the same regardless if there
> are
> > 2 switches or 20.
> > >
> > > Focus on the technology and you will pass.
> > >
> > > Tony Schaffran
> > > Network Analyst
> > > CCIE #11071
> > > CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
> > > NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
> > >
> > > www.cconlinelabs.com
> > > Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > Kenza@kenza.nl
> > > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 3:08 AM
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Anybody got lab with only 3 switches to
> configure
> > ? or is it the 4
> > > switches
> > > which have to be configured.
> > >
> > > im going to take the exam in januari.
> > >
> > > thx for your input
> > >
> > > rgds,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Disclaimer
> > >
> >
>
************************************************************************
> > > Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden
> > ontleend. Dit bericht is
> > > uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Als u
> > dit bericht per abuis
> > > hebt ontvangen, wordt u verzocht het te
> > vernietigen en de afzender te
> > > informeren. Wij adviseren u om bij twijfel over
> de
> > juistheid of de
> > > volledigheid van de mail contact met afzender op
> > te nemen.
> > >
> > > This message shall not constitute any rights or
> > obligations.
> > > This message is intended solely for the
> addressee.
> > > If you have received this message in error,
> please
> > delete it and
> > > notify the sender immediately. When in doubt
> > whether this message
> > > is correct or complete, please contact the
> sender.
> > >
> >
>
************************************************************************
> > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:37 ART