From: Joe Carr (jcarr@enventis.com)
Date: Tue Dec 12 2006 - 23:14:28 ART
I just went through the same thing at RTP. Got 0% for EGP and I know I should have had most or all the points in this section.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Gabriel Nunes
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4:53 PM
To: Scott Morris
Cc: Blastmor; Mike O; ccie >> Cisco certification
Subject: Re: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
I told to the proctor about the wrong percentage... She said me that she
would check...
About the wrong question, she agreed with me but I don`t know if they would
do something...
And I already sent an e-mail to ccie@cisco.com I didn`t have a reply... I
don`t want to stress this a lot with them because I already studied a lot
and I beleive I`m close to get the number...
This was only an outburst! :-)
Thank you guys!
On 12/12/06, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
>
> So allow me to state it in a different way... Sitting here and
> complaining
> back and forth does NOT solve the problem.
>
> Yeah, it doesn't help for someone to tell you to study more, because
> everyone knows that! But instead of commisserating with others around
> here,
> each and every one of you who has had mathematical or other difficulties
> needs to TELL CISCO ABOUT IT!
>
> If nobody says anything, they (upper management) may not know there are
> flaws in the system. If many people start (professionally) complaining
> about similar experiences, someone will say "There must be a problem,
> let's
> explore this."
>
> If nobody is willing to take this on, just what kind of expectation can
> you
> have of anything getting better?
>
> Yes, if all the frequency of this stuff occurring is increasing, it sucks.
> Sucks bigtime. But if nobody expresses opinions about this to those who
> matter and have a stake in making things better, then it doesn't serve any
> purpose other than to make ourselves feel a little better that we have
> found
> other people in similar situations.
>
> Whether it's the Assessor or the real lab or someone's practice labs,
> sometimes sh#*$ happens. Help make it right.
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
> #153, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
> IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> smorris@ipexpert.com
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Blastmor
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 1:10 PM
> To: Mike O
> Cc: ccie >> Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: anybody passed the CCIE r/s exam ?
>
> Guys, that's enough to say shit and common words like "Study hard and
> everything will be ok"!
> It's really annoying. Everybody knows it and tries to go through the
> technologies as much as possible in depth. But the cases like which
> happened
> to Gabriel become more and more frequent. And this is not a candidate
> failure as we see but Cisco's. Recently I took the Assessor and Autoverify
> said to me that I have missed RIP completely. That was lie! On the
> contrary
> RIP configuration was completely OK. Autoverify said that I missed 'router
> rip, ver 2' and so on....
> Is it candidate failure too or what?
> I hate this fu...ing tool cause it can play evil joke with me.
>
> --
> SY, Alexey
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 02 2007 - 07:50:37 ART